Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was just going to post this had no one posted the correction.That was actually Verizon's doing. They licensed the name from Lucas which is why the droid name is also attached to the HTC Droid Incredible and the upcoming Samsung Droid Charge. It's why you won't see any "Droids" on any other carrier. I don't know if I'd say it was actually a bad decision either considering Verizon's Droid marketing blitz is really something that pushed Android to the masses. The reason everyone thinks Android phones are all called Droids is because of them, and without it Android may not be as big as it actually is today. The Droid Does campaign benefited all of us in the long run I'm sure.
That's your opinion alright. I'm sure Moto feels differently though. While I agree that 'Droid' has caused mass confusion in the smartphone world, Motorola has successfully created one of the most recognized brands on the planet.
So from where they're sitting anyway, this wasn't such a bad idea.
This is the only aspect where I feel it was a terrible idea. It's annoying having someone say "I have a 'Droid'" when they mean Incredible or Evo, et al.
So here is the question: if true, does that really matter much? I have not looked for WinAmp for the iThingy. We (I am both an Android user and iPad user) have lots of choices for music players.
I find it odd that some folks bemoan a particular phone or device because a particular program is not available and completely forgetting that there are many alternatives that work just as well.
So I am asking, what does it really matter?
I do like WinAmp on my phone, however.
*mumbles* I hate iTune with a *screams* PASSIONThat's exactly my point. Does it matter that we don't have iTunes on Android? Nope. It sure doesn't. We can get music multiple other ways. Apple is just very good at marketing so they will make people think it matters.
LOL . . . it seems to me that you are doing the same thing you are objecting to. Perhaps you should say Apple works better for you rather than simply declare Apple is a better computer.
Millions of Windows users have few complaints; many Apple users likely have problems as well.
Bob
I've been using my macbook pro just shy of 2 years.
- Boots just as fast as it did day one
- never needs defragging
- no antivirus software constantly requiring an update
The above 3 things alone make it a better proposition than a Windows based laptop for me.
Defragging is so 10 years ago. Seriously, people still do that?
Now see, that is how you end up in the category where people judge you for not knowing what you're talking doing. Defragging is so 10 years ago. Seriously, people still do that? I don't even install virus software and I have only gotten a virus once in 19 years that I've owned PCs, twice in the 20 years I've been using them. I did get significantly more viruses and disk problems in 6 years of heavy Mac use but the comparison is unfair since 95% of that was in a university environment.
Don't listen to CNet. They've cultivated more ignorance than the Iraqi information minister.
I'm not trying to start a flame war, but I would like to comment on this.So you're saying you can a Windows based computer everyday for 2 years, including daily internet use, without any slowdown on boot or without contracting any unwanted viruses?
Do you honestly believe that Macs are immune to viruses and other malicious programs?
I'll take the 30 minutes to defrag my computer for that benefit. Having said that, I haven't ran a defragmentation program in 2 years.
So you're saying you can a Windows based computer everyday for 2 years, including daily internet use, without any slowdown on boot or without contracting any unwanted viruses?
That's nice but what is your performance like overall? I have a Windows desktop and a Macbook Pro. I have yet to use a windows based computer that did not require regular re-installs of windows in order to keep working at initial speeds. Windows slows down over time. If one actually does nothing to prevent it it'll become essentially unusable. This almost never happens with a mac.
Why do people claim things, usually Apple products, bose, dyson, brokstoon, work better just because they own said device, and think that anyone going to take them as a credible source of imformation when they haven't used any other devices and spend hundreds or thousands on a device without doing simple research?
Do actually believe that lol?
I can go on and on about how OS X doesn't work for me, and I'm sure that allot of people agree with me. So when you say *x* works better without any reasoning or logic as to how it does for you it just makes you look stupid.