Please allow me to pinch hit here, Steven may choose to say more later (or not).
Inside sources typically have their jobs on the line if caught.
For that reason, we always shy away from any public discussions of vetting.
Also, when reading any insider info, there are a number of factors for readers to consider, vetting is just one - but it all comes down to credibility.
When bringing insider info forward, be it staff or any member - or having self-claimed insiders come forward on their own - AndroidForums.com has an official policy on this, I'll paraphrase it to remove staff references, however, the paraphrasing is dead accurate:
The information and claims are laid open to our community. We expect the wisdom of the community working together to determine the final truth. If you accept or reject a source's credibility, that is your protected right here at AF. Just don't hate about it and don't engage in arguments about credibility or vetting - that it makes it personal and is not about issues.
The basic idea where a mod is concerned is don't trust us if we say it because we're staff - treat us per normal as members here like yourself (QFT: we are members first and just volunteers doing a temporary job on staff) and use your own judgement to place your trust.
~~~~~~~~~
Having completed the staff statements, here are my personal views.
- Steven is no one's fool, he's a mondo good guy
- Clearly, Admin (Phases) has sufficient trust to back Steven's play on this thread
- Clearly, the site owner (Rob) has sufficient trust to accept Steven's source for Phandroid articles
- Corporations can, have and will vet quislings to torpedo us - quasi-sources whose sole purpose is to spread disinformation
- Corporations can, have and will distribute disinfo or bent information so they can track and fire employees leaking information
- In every corporation, there is one person high enough up to make a final determination on things like a release date (with support from those below handling the various components of logistics for the release)
- That guy is the one whose head we want into
- Information changes - No plan survives engagement with the enemy
- A fully credible insider's information is only valid for the time he gives it - information changes
Steven's no fool.
Hope this helps!
PS -
Quoted for truth!