• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Swiping gestures explanation

Basically the phone can tell the difference between swiping with the tip of your finger and the edge of your hand (much bigger area). And it can tell the difference between swiping from an icon and swiping from the edge of the phone. So between these differences it should be extremely easy for the phone to distinguish these gestures.

To be honest, I find the "palm swipe for screenshot" gesture difficult to make work at all (perhaps because my phone case has a slightly raised lip), and hard to do reliably. Actually I also find it awkward to hold the phone and do this at all. I've tried to see whether I can trigger it accidentally, e.g. using multiple fingers, or laying a finger along the screen, and have not managed it so far. So I'm not sure how you triggered it accidentally during a call, since I find it hard enough to trigger deliberately. ;)

[Game] Grand Turbo Racing 3D – Experience Real Driving Thrills!

Hey fellow racing enthusiasts!
About Grand Turbo Racing 3D: Grand Turbo Racing 3D offers an immersive 3D car racing experience on your Android device. Feel the rush of the wind as you navigate through the city streets, all while earning cash for your thrilling maneuvers!

Key Features:
  • Real Driving Feel: Immerse yourself in a phase like driving experience with realistic physics and stunning graphics.
  • Cash Rewards: Drive around the city and earn cash for every daring move. Use your hard-earned cash to unlock a fleet of diverse and powerful cars.
  • Expansive City: Explore a vast city.
  • Diverse Car Collection: Unlock and choose from a variety of beautiful cars.
  • Daily Bonus: You will receive bonus cash every time you enter the game as a daily bonus.
Download Now on Google Play: Grand Turbo Racing 3D - Apps on Google Play

Note: The game is currently in beta mode with over 500 downloads, and your feedback is crucial for enhancing its features. Your input will play a significant role in boosting the overall game experience.

Attachments

  • WOW2.png
    WOW2.png
    973.8 KB · Views: 218
  • WOW3.png
    WOW3.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 72
  • 6.png
    6.png
    473.5 KB · Views: 376
  • GRAND (1).png
    GRAND (1).png
    393.1 KB · Views: 370

ROMs Errors trying to compile LineageOS 17.1 with updated clang (and other patches)

I'm trying to build LineageOS 17.1 for the Xperia XZ2 Compact. I have gotten it to successfully build stock, but now I'm onto optimizing it (mostly just applying patches from a XZ1 Compact repo). These patches are for the XZ1 Compact, which uses the Snapdragon 835, or the MSM8998. The XZ2 Compact uses a Snapdragon 845, or the SDM845. A few of these patches I run into errors when compiling. I'm mostly focusing on Clang since I know that would help with performance and battery. I'm not really sure what the other patches do.

Patch 1:
android_device_sony_lilac/patches/update-clang.patch at lineage-17.1 · Flamefire/android_device_sony_lilac

The error:

Extra context:
displays_str is not in the MSM8998 source. I'm not really sure what it does, but if I remove it, it continues to compile but runs into a different error later on. I also don't want to disable some core functionality related to the display, so I'd rather not remove it. There is updated and different code for the function in LineageOS 18.1 source, but replacing the old code with the new code only results in a different error relating to displays_str.

Error 2:

Extra context:
I have no idea what this means or how to fix it. It would probably be helpful if I captured a bit more in this screenshot, but I didn't. I would prefer to get more info once I get displays_str fixed instead of bypassing it again.

For these patches I will get into less detail, as I don't think it's needed, but if you need it, I can recompile with the patch to get a full error.

Patch 2:
android_device_sony_lilac/patches/fix-llvm-unwind-warning-and-findUnwindSections.patch at lineage-17.1 · Flamefire/android_device_sony_lilac

The compiling error was command not found and suggested replacing -Wno-bitwise-conditional-parentheses (On line 11 in the patch) with -Wno-bitwise-op-parentheses and it just worked. Not sure what it changes or even if that just invalidates the entire patch, but it worked.


Patch 3:
android_device_sony_lilac/patches/suppress-bool-operation-warning.patch at lineage-17.1 · Flamefire/android_device_sony_lilac

The compiling error was again command not found, but had no suggestion for replacing -Wno-bool-operation (On line 12 in the patch). Not sure what this does either. No fix for it (aside from not including) for now.


Patch 4:
android_device_sony_lilac/patches/update-abi-dumps.patch at lineage-17.1 · Flamefire/android_device_sony_lilac

This causes a bunch of errors but the compiler helped me and I was able to fix it with the four commands below.
$ANDROID_BUILD_TOP/development/vndk/tools/header-checker/utils/create_reference_dumps.py -l libhidlbase
$ANDROID_BUILD_TOP/development/vndk/tools/header-checker/utils/create_reference_dumps.py -l libhwbinder_noltopgo
$ANDROID_BUILD_TOP/development/vndk/tools/header-checker/utils/create_reference_dumps.py -l libstagefright_foundation
$ANDROID_BUILD_TOP/development/vndk/tools/header-checker/utils/create_reference_dumps.py -l libprotobuf-cpp-full
Again not sure if this just invalidates the patch, but it worked.

I would really appreciate some help with this. I don't really know what I'm doing when it comes to coding.

Will all my tasks be lost from my Android Calendar app?

I have a Motorola and the installed calendar app is the Google calendar.
So no need to fret about losing anything as long as it is setup with your Gmail account.
But you need to verify exactly which calendar app you are using....
A belated thank you, Dannydet, for this helpful reply (the last few days have been hectic, and I could not use my computer). I am unable to find out which calendar is on the phone. I have tried in various ways, but all I see is "Calendar". However, in Settings, I did find Backup, which includes Calendar and other files, and it has now been backed up (to my Google account, it seems). I shall look at my gmail account and see how that figures in all this. However, I keep no online diaries or calendars, so there will be no need to transfer events etc. from my computer.

If there are any further hurdles to jump, I shall enquire again of this marvellous forum. One final question, Dannydev: do I presume rightly that, in the event of setting up a new Android phone, all that would be required would be for me to connect to my Google (not gmail) account, and the Calendar tasks would be automatically transferred?
With thanks again,
S.

change TV input from google TV app

if your phone had an IR blaster, you might be able to switch inputs. however, most phones did away with that many years ago. i do not know how the chromecast remote can switch inputs, it might be something similar, but i am not completely sure. but if you could change the inputs via the app, you would think they would make it completely obvious that you could. so i doubt, since you can't find it in the app anywhere, that you can.

Should I switch to YouTube Premium?

Maybe it's just my ears, but I don't hear anything different between the same songs on Amazon Music Unlimited and YouTube Music - in fact, YTM has a little more "punch" and AMU seems weaker. I would have expected that had I experienced a wider soundstage... but I don't.

I'll try tweaking the earbuds and my over-ear headset, but I'm pretty sure I'll kill off AMU during the free trial.

Minimal Digital Watch Face

Hi,

I released a new watch face: Minimal Digital Watch Face


As always, free to try, but if you like the design, you can unlock all the features as a premium user.

The free version has a lot of settings to customize your watch face: colors, date, format, etc...

The premium unlocks the custom data, complications, custom shortcuts, secondary timezone, and a lot more!

I hope that you will like it!

y5MwbnZm.jpg
KB7GE5tm.jpg

icI6YuTm.jpg
apZ3zAFm.jpg

9tGUJTkm.jpg
xCnbrMkm.jpg

[UPDATE] NewPipe 0.26.1: Youtube Client for android receives a major update

The NewPipe app, known for being an alternative client for YouTube on the Android system, has released its version 0.26.1. The update introduces support for a variety of new content, including YouTube live streams, Shorts, and dedicated pages for channels. Additionally, the new version brings improvements for other streaming platforms supported by NewPipe, such as PeerTube, Bandcamp, and SoundCloud.


Delta Business (1250 × 750 px) - 2024-01-07T125257.028.jpg

Medicare supplement plans

@The_Chief Understand that in most states, you can't simply just go back to original medicare. You are subject to underwriting. If you have any Pre-existing condition, the supplement companies (in most states, not all) have the right to reject you or jack up your rates astronomically. That's how seniors feel trapped. That's why the medicare decisions are very important and will have consequences on your medicare for the rest of your life.

Android Auto on Samsung Tablet "Not Compatible"

here try this:

and do not use crack.....just say no to drugs:thumbsupdroid:
I can't get the app to work. I get the following message on my phone "Incompatible Software Version!"

Downloading (paid!) APK from Google Play & sideloading it?

Hi all,

kind of a weird question due to some special circumstances:

I have an older (ca. 2019) Amazon 10" Fire tablet running something like FireOS 7.xx which AFAIK was still based on Android 5.x. I also have a Galaxy J-something smartphone (running Android 7.x IIRC) somewhere which I can't find atm, unfortunately (I've been using non-Android phones for years). So this is about said Amazon tablet primarily.

I have the Google Play store installed on the tablet (as per several instructions on the net), and it generally works fine. Since I installed the Google Play app, I only ever got apps from there.

Now I'd like to buy the Caustic 3 synthesizer Android app, which is still widely regarded as the best app of this kind for Android. It may (or may not) be abandoned, but you seemingly can still buy it at Google Play. Last version was (and probably will alway be) 3.2 from 2013.

This app comes as a freely downloadable base app and a separate for-purchase "Unlock Key" (no IAP). If I look it up in the Play Store from my desktop PC, it looks like both are still in the store and most importantly, you can still purchase the unlock key.

However, if I try to find it in the Play Store bolted-on to the Amazon tablet, both are nowhere to be found. That's a bit weird since the app should run fine on Anroid 5.x. Amazon's own (kinda joke of an) app store has the (v3.1!) program itself, but not the unlock key.

There have been some reports of people running the Amazon-downloaded app with a Google Play-acquired unlock key, but I can't see how that could work.
In my case, this would require me to purchase the unlock key in some way off the tablet (maybe inside the desktop browser?), and then to somehow get it onto the tablet and hopefully, the unlock magic would still work then.

I never read anything about downloading the APK files of your own purchases directly from Google Play to anything other than the final target device and, even if such an APK download was feasable, I have no idea whether or not the licensing-DRM-whatever magic can be made to work after an APK transfer.

Please note that I'm only ever talking here about making a legitmately purchased app work and not about 'hacks' or such of any kind.

Could someone tell me if and how this could work?

I apologize in case this has been discussed before in another thread but my search turned up nothing that hit the spot (downloading your "own" APKs and "messing with it").

TIA
Android hmmmmm... I mean Andrite is completely AOSP. LOOGLE is myself/yourself as far as no cost. Only Playstore requires payment for extra features. I mean I get you want youre purchase to follow you on youre devices and that should be by original google account/email you used when you purchased the full features of the APK. under that Gmail account. **** playstore root and use Lucky Patcher as we ALL know its safe to mention LP now the once double edged sword by non other than the great Chelpus. I mean Helpus. Dont pay for shit anymore Android is Open Source Not Open wallet. Shut the door on an open situation. FREEEEEEDOM!

How Did I Prevent Bloatware And Google From My New Device? (My latest experiment)

You're dealing with the first-time setup of a device. It won't let you pass without all that jazz.

Welcome to the modern era. Now you know why I try to steer clear of it and relive the past. Think it's scary now, just wait till Neuralink becomes a thing.
Naw, no terms or conditions apply with LOOGLE. EVVVERY! option is youre own and NO apks come on the devices i will be kickin out to you all from the Andritian WirlWind PC. PC now stands for Prowessing Creator/Ply-able CO owner/$ Build youre own fully optimable optional operations. Youre device youre options. Though now we wont be wondering if our operating systems/device makeup is built by a policing corp. and not a vauge term such as GOOGLE/GOV. operative conglomerate masked as a soft/hardware company wich is refered by itself as such. YOURE TERMS MY CONDITION. LOOGLE IS ALMOST HERE!

Help Does Google modify callers' voices broadcast from the Pixel's speaker to prevent recording by PC voice recorder apps?

What magic signal do you think they are adding that allows the human ear to hear the voices normally but stymies mechanical recording? If they were outputting any additional sound within the audible range you would hear the distortion yourself. A signal at a different frequency would be ineffective (because it would not affect the frequencies of interest). For sure you could add noise that would make life difficult for a mic, relying on the human brain's pattern recognition abilities to let you understand what is being said, but if you did that the voice would definitely not be normal or clear to you.

If you have 2 speakers you can use interference (in the specific sense of interference of waves, not just the generic term "interference") to cancel out a sound in a particular location. But that only works if you have 2 speakers and some electronics which knows where they both are and where you want the sound to be cancelled, so that one can output an inverse waveform with the correct amplitude and phase offset to achieve the cancellation where you want it. If you try to put a destructive interference out through the single speaker you get no sound out at all (the 2 electrical signals sent to the speaker would cancel each other out and the speaker would not receive any signal at all, and hence output no sound whatsoever). There is no way that a single phone can do this.

If you were using a radio mic then you could imagine outputting a radio signal to jam its communications with the computer, but that would not affect just one side of the conversation. And I believe that's a USB mic, so we can dismiss that theory. Plus you need to be careful about using jammers in public places: even if you restrict them to the unlicensed radio bands (so that they are not illegal to operate), which you might guess is what a radio mic would use, they could easily affect other devices that use those bands (because you'd have to jam the entire band, not just a narrow channel, since you don't know which channel the radio mic is set to use). It would be a commercially risky move for Google to put something like that into a phone, as the potential downsides would way exceed any benefit.

Plus, on that last point, what would the commercial benefit of Google doing anything like this be? Google only gain from it if it increases sales, but it can't do that if it's an unadvertised, hidden feature.

My friend William of Occam suggests you look for a simpler explanation.
Damn SMART ****IN KID I GOT HERE A!? Wow! Hadron, Sounds almost like an evolved being/living PC you are refering to here.

Filter

Back
Top Bottom