cereal killer
Android Expert
Still no OFFICIAL confirmation from Verizon 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good morning, fellow droidaholics.. . . . .
4)CES is in the beginning of January. This will be the moment of truth. You can get your Galaxy Nexus in November or you can wait a mere 3 months to see if 28nm devices truly are only a few months away.. . . . .
-Android devices using the next generation of micro-architecture (28nm) will undoubtedly be showcased at CES in January.
In summation:
-It takes about 1.5 years for a new micro-architecture to come along.
-The first major Android devices with the "current" micro-architecture (45nm) were released about a year ago.
-The Galaxy Nexus uses this architecture and is being released next month.
-Android devices using the next generation of micro-architecture (28nm) will undoubtedly be showcased at CES in January.
Again, I'm not advocating the waiting game. I'm saying that by looking at the past we can observe cycles. One cycle is on it's way out and a new one should be starting up in the next few months. It's my personal preference to drop ~$300 on the bleeding edge.
AnandTech - Qualcomm's New Snapdragon S4: MSM8960 & Krait Architecture Explored
Yea, if the pricing is $199/16GB and $299/32G i would go for the 16GB option. All my music is in the cloud and I'm living with 16gb now, so i wouldnt be worried.
Great post, PowerCosmic. I would agree with you except that personal preference has a lot of weight in my decision, obviously. If I thought "Man, that Nexus is FUGLY!" or "I hate that processor speed!", etc., I'd wait. But I think this phone is simply stunning.
Also, I'm willing to bet that Verizon probably won't be allowing another pure Android, direct-from-Google-updated phone in a long time, if ever. I'm getting off the train here and will be content for the next two years, at least.![]()
Good morning, fellow droidaholics. When I made my post last night suggesting that we're on the tail end of 45nm processors there were some other considerations going on my mind that I failed to mention. Deepest apologies. Let's get to it, shall we?
1)The OG Droid used a 65nm OMAP3430 and was released October 2009. The Droid 3 uses a 45nm OMAP4430 and was released on July 2011. So using these reference points we see that it takes ~1.5 years for a device to come along that incorporates a smaller processor. You can do your own research and perhaps you'll find better reference points but I think you'll find that this leap in technology is still somewhere around 1.5 years. This should also sound familiar to those who watch advances in desktop processors as well.
Now, the natural conclusion here is: "Well, PowerCosmic, you're saying that Texas Instruments' 45nm processor is relatively new to market. Wouldn't that mean that they're not going to put out a 28nm processor for quite some time?"
Sadly, for TI, that's true but I'm actually not trying to focus on Texas Instruments here. Those are just concrete examples to illustrate the time span it generally takes before a smaller architecture comes along. The fact of the matter is TI is pretty far behind the curve. That OMAP4460 in the Galaxy Nexus may be new to end users but the 45nm technology in general is pretty darn old.
2)Qualcomm has been ~1 year ahead of the curve. The first major device to use their 45nm processor was the Dezire Z/G2 in November 2010. So when Qualcomm says that they have 28nm processor coming in H1 of 2012 they're probably not kidding. Qualcomm claims in several articles to already have sent this technology to phone manufacturers.
3)There's not really any other large advances in micro-architecture on the horizon. Oh sure, there's claims that we might see 4 cores by the end of 2012/beginning of 2013 but as far as processors getting smaller, 28nm is it; certainly for the remainder of 2013 (as illustrated above).
4)CES is in the beginning of January. This will be the moment of truth. You can get your Galaxy Nexus in November or you can wait a mere 3 months to see if 28nm devices truly are only a few months away.
In summation:
-It takes about 1.5 years for a new micro-architecture to come along.
-The first major Android devices with the "current" micro-architecture (45nm) were released about a year ago.
-The Galaxy Nexus uses this architecture and is being released next month.
-Android devices using the next generation of micro-architecture (28nm) will undoubtedly be showcased at CES in January.
Again, I'm not advocating the waiting game. I'm saying that by looking at the past we can observe cycles. One cycle is quite clearly on it's way out and the new cycle should be starting up in the next few months.
That's all I have to say on this for now. ICS looks cool, the connectivity sure is neat, but if I'm going to spend that much money I'm personally going to wait for refreshed hardware.
Here's a useful chart that kind of summarizes my point rather neatly:
AnandTech - Qualcomm's New Snapdragon S4: MSM8960 & Krait Architecture Explored
This is good advice .. to a point.
Perhaps a more important way of assessing when to buy is not related to specs at all (gasp !), but to what affect the improvements in hardware 6 months down the line could possibly have in that user's actual, real world day to day use of the phone.
Just saying that there will be this new CPU chip or new GPU or screen or <whatever> 6 months from now means next to nothing to me. The decision process should be:
-What do I use the phone for most of the time? (Answer is X, Y , Z)
- Will those (X Y Z) apps/uses likely be affected in ANY significant REAL WORLD WAY by some slightly upgraded hardware 6 months from now? Will it be noticeable in any real world way?
I think, with where the high end hardware is right now, the answer in most cases will be no for most users. There will be edge cases that will argue that they really can perceive how much faster a dual core 1.5 chip is over a dual core 1.2 chip in application X. Well, then they should wait and wait. For the vast majority of folks, my guess is that the difference in various hardware 6 months out, compared to hardware that is out there now may be imperceptible in many apps we use in real world use and that playing the waiting game is mostly not worth it ...
Just my 2 cents ..
Still no OFFICIAL confirmation from Verizon![]()
Engadget says ICS for Razr Q1,2012......true??
Nice to see you're still with us Han! You did a bit of vascillating the past few days and I wasn't sure if you'd be pleased with the outcome.
krait is due in 1H of 2012. so who knows when we'll see the phone. we might not even get any hard dates until MWC in feb. so just keep that in mind. you could easily be looking at 6+ months
The trend between the Nexus One, S, and Galaxy Nexus is that they are released 10-12 months apart. There will not be a new Nexus until Fall/Winter 2012.Don't get me wrong, I want this phone. If I could go to the store today and get it I would; however, I'm almost convinced a 'Galaxy Nexus 2' will come out by the Spring with updated hardware: 1.5 GHz, bigger battery, etc. Bottom line, I don't want another Android device that is skinned with MotoBlur, TouchWiz or (incredible) Sense. I want a pure, Android experience out of the box, so I think I'll either stick with my Incredible and wait it out some more or jump on this as soon as its released. Also, the fact that it isn't getting ICS ported to it is a plus. It was built FOR ICS versus it being built on a different version and then later getting the upgrade (which always causes delays, bugs and errors given my experience).
Still no OFFICIAL confirmation from Verizon![]()
Great post, PowerCosmic. I would agree with you except that personal preference has a lot of weight in my decision, obviously. If I thought "Man, that Nexus is FUGLY!" or "I hate that processor speed!", etc., I'd wait. But I think this phone is simply stunning.
Also, I'm willing to bet that Verizon probably won't be allowing another pure Android, direct-from-Google-updated phone in a long time, if ever. I'm getting off the train here and will be content for the next two years, at least.![]()
. . . . . Now,between me and you,I saw the device back in late July. . . . . . .with other devices coming down the pipeline. . . . . .
I'm with Han on this one. I'm jumping off the train at the Nexus station because:
(a) It's an awesome and (virtually) future-proof device.. . . .
I'm with Han on this one. I'm jumping off the train at the Nexus station because:
(a) It's an awesome and (virtually) future-proof device.
(b) My OG Droid will NOT wait until next year to retire.
(c) Verizon may never allow this again. They want way too much control.
This may be the best shot ever at getting an unlocked, bloatware-free, top-of-the-line Nexus device on Big Red. My only hope is that so many people jump on Nexus and forsake RAZR that Verizon gets the message that we will put our money where we will, not where they want us to... and start allowing more super-awesome phones like this in the future.
There will be no bloat.I'm with everyone who doesn't want verizon bloating this thing to death, but don't look over the fact google said a part of ICS will be the ability to delete any app, even gmail or market. Bloat will(read should) > be easily removed
I was under the impression that Beam was a function of NFC, so any phone in the future that has NFC will be able to Beam.