They'll release it. They have warehouses full of them and they can't just send them back to Samsung. Also, they're getting bombarded with GNex inquiries, and if they weren't going to release it, they'd just tell us so to shut everyone up.
I have become skeptical of Verizon having warehouses full of them already. Surfing around elsewhere, I have found indications of persons testing engineering models of the LTE version and getting a new engineering version this month. Admittedly, the information is limited enough to support multiple interpretations, but there is enough to support the notion that there have been some recent hardware changes.
I think VZW is sophisticated enough to be cautious about filling the warehouses too early. I also can understand why VZW would be reticent to trumpet the problems too loudly.
Very EXCELLENT post!!!! Let me ask a question, though: If all you say is true and correct (and I am not doubting it because it DOES make sense), is it then fair to say that it was really GOOGLE and SAMSUNG who "screwed the pooch" on this launch by announcing it, unveiling it, and TELLING THE WORLD about it back in October in Hong Kong if it was really, truly, a solid 1.5 to 2 MONTHS from being "ready for prime time"??
If that Hong Kong event doesnt happen, then we have a LOT less anger, angst, and bad mojo towards VZW in this thread, don't you think?
Yes. The problem, however, is the HSPA and LTE versions seem to have been on separate development tracks. This has been mentioned in the mean time by nj02vette
here. If you go ahead with the announcement when the LTE version is not ready, LTE carriers get unhappy. If you delay the announcement for further work on the LTE version, HSPA carriers wanting to go ahead and roll out their version get unhappy. Someone is unhappy either way. Of course, delaying announcement of the phone also delays Google's announcement of Ice Cream Sandwich, because they need to show it on something.
Thinking about the unhappiness, was there not discussion in this thread shortly after the Hong Kong event that there was a lot of frustration inside VZW about the announcement or some related aspect of the situation? If I am recalling this correctly, this could be why.
Look, I am no Verizon apologist. I have been dealing with them for a long, long time in multiple contexts, and I have a sense of how they work. And it is there history that makes many of the conspiracy ideas so believable. However, I have begun to think that VZW is, at least in part, grappling with some underlying technical issues of a non-trivial variety.