mrochester
Lurker
I don't think you understood what I was saying at all.
I'm talking about restricting a product for the sake of battery life, which I find to idiotic from a consumer standpoint. Do Apple products get better battery life that Android products? Duh, the answer will typically be yes. Can an iPhone do everything an Android phone can do because it is restricted? No, not even close.
Having a replaceable battery on a phone goes to the very heart of the difference between Apple and Android. It is about choice. You have the choice to buy and extended battery or stay with the factory installed one. You have the choice of buying an extra battery to use if that is what you feel you need. You have the choice to run flash or not install it all. You have a choice to run live wallpaper or install 50 different widgets. You have the choice set things up to conserve battery life or let things run wide open and let the sucker drain down as quickly as you want.
IMNSHO, I think that people make far too much of an issue about battery life anyway. These aren't flip phones, they are mobile computers now. Some people do more on their phone than they do on their own computer. If anyone expects a battery to last for a full day they are kidding themselves. How long do most true laptop batteries last? 6 hours or so? Why in the world would you expect something that works just as hard, if not harder to last a whole lot longer. Besides, this is why we have wall chargers and car chargers in the first place. If you are going to be away from any power source for a long period of time then you have the choice to buy an extra battery. If you are going to be away for longer than the life of two batteries then get three or four or twenty. You have the options available if that is what you need to do.
The whole point is that these options are available to Android users, but not Apple users. God gave us free will and so did Android. What we do from there is pretty much up to us.
Ummmm, yea. Just about anyone with an open mind would agree that sites like BGR and CNET are overly biased towards Apple.
Look up the iPhone vs Moto Droid review they did. The iPhone won even though they couldn't receive or make a call on it and they even commented about how horrible making calls were on the iPhone. How can a phone win a contest when it isn't capable of making or receiving calls?
Choice is only a 'good' feature if you actively use it. A replaceable battery is one area where this can be highlighted. In all the 10 years now I've been using smartphones, other than to take out/insert a sim card, I have never replaced or swapped a battery in any of my phones. To me, this makes a non-removable battery a non issue because it's not something I've ever had a need/desire to do, and I still don't. I suspect the vast majority of consumers don't do so either. Does that mean an Android phone with a removable battery is a better choice for me? Of course not, because I don't care whether I can remove the battery or not! I'm going to be looking at some other feature that is important to me.
I think where Apple are smart is that they allow consumers choice where consumers want choice (device colour, storage capacity) and don't allow choice for the sake of choice in areas that consumers don't care about. This then allows Apple to focus resources on making other features better.