drexappeal
Extreme Android User
Personally pleased but diehard isn't quite accurate.
The last six phones I've recommended successfully to family and friends were either Motorolas or Samsungs - get the right tool for the job and Android wins.
I was genuinely interested in the G3. Had it been out before I stopped to think about what I really wanted, I'd have already bought one and be singing its praises.
It was the 805 discussion brought up by others here that made me rethink the G3, leading me to want to wait for the HTC Prime/Plus - and eventually waking up and realizing that all I really wanted was my old phone with BoomSound.
Thanks to KitKat, I've already lost some features (thanks for borking zoom text reflow in the WebKit, Google ) but I was going to face all that regardless.
So anyway, I'm now a huge knock knock fan (wake up my M8 with it ftw).
Well, I'd have considered myself a HTC diehard before, EM (Mogul>TouchPro>Evo). You stuck it out longer with Android HTC phones w/ Evo>Evo3d>LTEvo>M8. You've had a propensity for leaning towards them. Didn't mean it as an offense my friend, just saying that it's not a complete surprise, in my eyes. And the m8 is a great phone, so nothing to really justify to anyone except self, right?
Look at me, I'm a Note series diehard now and the G3 isn't going to be my primary, but still getting it. I'm all about OEM's stepping up their game so that the choices become more difficult each year, for all the consumers. That's what gets people the phone that suits their needs the best. If there was one specific manufacturer that had the best of the best, for everyone's needs (errr...of course, talking Android here), then all of us consumers, including the diehards, would have to just "settle" (e.g. One Plus One). What's funny is, I think Google should take that "Never Settle" marketing gimic from One Plus One. Having the Alliance with multiple OEM's, allows for people to never have to "settle" when it comes to choosing an Android smartphone.