Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think that's true, I know there are certain religions that have very strong views that only theirs path is the right path but I would think the majority would disagree with that. It all boils down to having values and in most religions those values are pretty similar.1. There must be at least 100 different religions out there, and each one claims that the other 99 are wrong. Why is that? (I gave up after i went thru about 5)
I think I answered this above, why must you think of God as s/he or as an individual? Jesus was the individual. The mystery of faith is that every time we share in the communion we are doing as Christians have done for centuries and are therefore sharing in Christ with all Christians regardless of time and space. That's the mystery.2. Why does god need a prophet? If s/he was truly omnipotent, a prophet would not be needed. S/he could talk to / reveal him/herself to all of us at any time. No "mystery of faith" needed.
Again the sceptics can't shift from the idea of God being a large man with a long white beard that for what ever reason won't down out of the sky and fix things. They don't seem to be able to be more open minded about what God is.4. And if you really want to test your faith, why does god hate amputees?
Probably the thing that annoys me the most is when people say "God works in mysterious ways." or "It's God's will." Its like saying that it was fate for that to occur... which also implies that the concept of free will is all an illusion.
All Christians believe we are on a journey and at the end of the journey is a destination or goal. There are many paths to the destination and we don't always take the best route. Luckily we have our trusty Sat-Nav or God who can guide us and tell us when we are going the wrong way. We don't have to listen though, we can continue to go the wrong way or turn it off completely but if we keep it on it will keep giving directions through each wrong turn leading us back to the right path.
In my earlier post we talked about facts. So now here are some questions to consider in our quest to find the true TRUTH (whatever that is):
1. There must be at least 100 different religions out there, and each one claims that the other 99 are wrong. Why is that? (I gave up after i went thru about 5)
2. Why does god need a prophet? If s/he was truly omnipotent, a prophet would not be needed. S/he could talk to / reveal him/herself to all of us at any time. No "mystery of faith" needed.
3. Why is the New Testament written by people that lived at least 80 years after Christ's death? If Jesus/God was so smart, he would have had his own apostles documenting his life when they were alive. Just sayin'
4. And if you really want to test your faith, why does god hate amputees?
5. Oh, and one more for extra credit: why do the begats go back to Joseph?
No idea what you're talking about here.
In my earlier post we talked about facts. So now here are some questions to consider in our quest to find the true TRUTH (whatever that is):
1. There must be at least 100 different religions out there, and each one claims that the other 99 are wrong. Why is that? (I gave up after i went thru about 5)
2. Why does god need a prophet? If s/he was truly omnipotent, a prophet would not be needed. S/he could talk to / reveal him/herself to all of us at any time. No "mystery of faith" needed.
3. Why is the New Testament written by people that lived at least 80 years after Christ's death? If Jesus/God was so smart, he would have had his own apostles documenting his life when they were alive. Just sayin'
4. And if you really want to test your faith, why does god hate amputees?
5. Oh, and one more for extra credit: why do the begats go back to Joseph?
Begats are: "Mary begat Jesus"(had, gave birth to, is the parent of, you get the idea). I guess he's saying the first in line(of this particular lineage of people) is Joseph.
M theory really says that membranes collided (the big bang), created vibrations that we (theoretically) perceive as strings, and the vibrations of those strings are what we perceive as matter. We know nothing about the parallel universes whose membranes (boundaries) collided - we don't know if our laws applied there.
Matter can be created - and is. In the quantum foam, virtual particle pairs are constantly being created and then mutually annihilating each other. At the event horizon of a black hole, the virtual particles become real, with one being ejected into our universe's space and the other disappearing. This is the mechanism for black hole dissipation, that satisfies a bit of thermodynamics and in effect, means that black holes are kinda really white holes.
Matter is destroyed in stars and nuclear weapons - matter is converted into energy and therefore destroyed by conversion.
So, rather than saying that there's a conservation of matter (neither created nor destroyed), what we really seem to think we have is conservation of the total of matter, energy and momentum all together.
If you dig deeper, I think you'll find that we don't even know what space is.
We're still trying to learn the right questions, so we're probably far off from knowing real answers.
So, you could be right about matter creating our universe, but don't sign up for Nobel prizes just yet. And if I'm wrong and you win, you can use some of this in your acceptance speech for the low, low price of $30.![]()
![]()
![]()
So George Lucas was on to something after all eh? I remember hearing something about people trying to start a religeon based on the 'force' from the Star Wars films. I just write it off as a bunch of nut cases! But the way you so eloquently put it, I can almost see myself setting up a 'Yoda' statue up and praying to him.![]()
byteware said:As has already been stated, every culture ever found believes in a God of some sort. Do you really think that if we started a new one, they wouldn't believe in a God as well?
There is a conflict of information.byteware said:Science attempts to explain the how, and religion attempts to explain the why.
Science and Religion don't necessarily conflict.
Anyone mentioned Free Will? Thats also because He loves us.........
Anyone mentioned Free Will? Thats also because He loves us. Yes, He is all mighty and powerful and He can do everything, but He has given us free will to do whatever we want. Everytime you do something stoopid (idk if that actual word is blocked.lol), you still wake up in the morning and be alive right? How many people have you heard sleeping perfectly healthy and not waking up? That might be because they challenged God in a different way that He has to prove He is there. And never challenge God.
I think Dawkins says it best,
""The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."
I don't really consider living under a celestial dictatorship as a good thing and if you actually read the bible, he doesn't seem to be so loving as people are led to believe.
That's not a very convincing argument. What do you mean by perfectly healthy people not waking up? Like cardiac arrest? or is that sentence figurative?
And the sentence in bold... a good example of how religion rules with fear.
I dont know what religion you are talking about because the one i know rules with love. Its not a fear of being judged or questioned in Heaven because He has forgiven us. Love Keeps No Record of Wrongs (1 Corinthians 13:5)
I dont know what religion you are talking about because the one i know rules with love. Its not a fear of being judged or questioned in Heaven because He has forgiven us. Love Keeps No Record of Wrongs (1 Corinthians 13:5)
Also claiming God is metaphysical and outside our realm of understanding does not free him from criticism. The same argument can be made for any metaphysical being or mythical creature and doesn't add to the validity of God.
There is a conflict of information.
Science is systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
Religion is a branch of pseudo science with various methods, theories, or systems having no scientific basis which can be dangerous.
Parts of the Old Testament does mention how God had certain rules that is outside of what Humans can bare. But you dont look on the first side of the book and conclude the story, did you continue reading the New Testament and see what God has done? Everyone can be saved because He sacrificed His son.
Now, that doesn't mean that their aren't religious people who create pseudo science in order justify their beliefs (intelligent design).
You said to "never challenge God". What would happen if I do? Why can't I challenge him? It's in human nature to challenge others and not blindly follow whatever a book or group of people say. If there are issues that I have with someone, even God, am I not allowed to challenge him? It sounds like a bit of a dictatorship. If I don't challenge him... then I will be in good terms with him but If I do... there will be dire consequences?
And yet God keeps a record of our wrongs... doesn't he.
Your Christian holy book, as I recall and if I understand correctly, claims there is only one true god, and you know him through that book.
What about the Jews who believe in only half of that holy book (to generalize the concept) and actually have their own holy book?
What about Muslims whose religion is founded in the same tribal roots but who use yet a different holy book?
And what about those of us who simply are not part of the Near Mideast Theisms and find no applicability of your holy book or that of the Jews or the Muslims?
What about the highly populous subcontinent and far Asian plains whose holy books predate your holy book yet are still read and followed today?
What about those of us who don't believe we need saving in the first place because we do not need saving?