Ok, you're entitled to your opinion, but your opinion is fundamentally at odds with facts.
You're clearly thinking about this as if we were talking about cars or any other finished goods, and it's all driven by economics.
It's just not.
The nanometer roadmap that you're referring to was laid down and scheduled over a decade ago - and it has always been driven by the machine manufacturers projections and their constant adjustment of that to reality.
When Intel gets 14 nm stuff, they're going to get the consumer credit but it will be their machine providers that made it possible.
If we could have done 14 nm ten years ago, we would have, right then.
None of this artificial economy you think it's about.
True or false - our space fleet does not fly at warp speed and time jump because of dirty economics? Or because certain things required just cannot exist yet?
If you think that doesn't apply here as well, you're entitled to your opinion.
My opinion is I know some of the people who literally slave to invent the next refinement at dimensions so small you can count electrons, and no amount of money will make them any smarter or produce any more quickly.
One woman can have one baby in nine months.
Nine women can have nine babies in nine months.
But nine women cannot have one baby in one month, no matter what economic model you try, including the one that says that they can.
PS - I didn't intend for this to come across as antagonizing and I admit I may have some confusion about your post due to my interpretation of it.